Thread:Mikey thinkin/@comment-25219384-20170917053159/@comment-26115937-20170917090449

Ah, I apologise. I hadn't realised that was intentional. I confess I wasn't clear what Gain was meant to do as it wasn't documents and I was a bit short on time to read through the source code. It does make sense and I've reverted to the original use.

Having said that, would it not make more to simply allow Increase to take a custom text parameter? Or if we are to still use Gain then allow the custom text to be part of 'that' template (as opposed to writing out the text as a comment after the template use - that was the main factor that made me change it without double checking; I tend to assume that anything "hard"-written into the code needs to be corrected)