Thread:Adnoam/@comment-26336582-20180824081323/@comment-26115937-20180824114432

Good idea. Adnoam and I discussed it in the past - I can't recall exactly what the issues were at the time but I like the idea in principle. Two points on template implementation:

1. The current structure is to categorise the Gain/Source categories under the corresponding quality. If we intend to maintain this structure then the template would need to do that categorisation.

2. There is the issue with Gain vs Sources. Discrete qualities have sources (rather than gain) but it is inappropriate to use ItemSources there as the latter template would ultimately categorise the page under Items. Ultimately it's not a giant issue as the current template code doesn't do a whole lot that needs distinguishing between the two. But I guess I was wondering if the template name might cause confusion. Also the wording "Storylets and actions which increase" might need tweaking to make it slightly more generic.

(Personally I actually favour combining QualityGain and ItemSources under some common wrapper template but I know it's not an insignificant amount of work)