Thread:ZDee/@comment-1264592-20130501155822/@comment-1264592-20130506143834

ZDee wrote:

We don't even need to use both formulas above to find out the F and U %'s for a particular challenge. Once we have enough information to properly calculate one, the other will be known. Ex: We discover the U% to be 30%. We subtract that from 100%, and we're left with a F% of 70%. It's better to record all outcome for luck challenges because in statistics the more data the better. Failed luck results should help us determine the most accurate success rate precisely because of the (1-p) relationship between the two.

Also, I don't think articles should have the number of tries next to the rare success chance because when it comes to actual articles I believe that only the information useful to most users should be displayed. If someone wants to examine the underlining calculations they would enter the Rare Success article where, hopefully, such data would be stored (or it'll have a link to the google spreadsheet).