Talk:Coax tricks of the trade from them/@comment-93.135.184.158-20170228153133

It is something I do not really understand: Why are subtle and steadfast mutually exclusive, or at least ('mutually') offsetting? Can one not be subtle but still true to one's actions and words? Just because you listen to someone closely or charm and coax it does not necessarily mean you are dishonest and deceiving, does it? Maybe that actually was your agreement with someone? Maybe you do (not) want to hurt someone but still do what you promised or think is right? I somehow cannot quite follow, may someone be so kind and please explain it to me?

Austere vs. Hedonist, makes sense. As does Heartless vs. Magnanimous. Ruthless is not so good with Magnanimous, although not exactly exclusive, Melancholy can or can not be opposite to Hedonist (since one could try to drown their sorrows in pleasure..). Steadfast is probably fine with everything except Daring and maybe Magnanimous/Heartless (which are likely not helping to be steadfast or being steadfast at one of them should reduce the other one). So, Forceful and/or Daring vs. Subtle would makes sense. Or Forceful vs. Subtle and Daring vs. Steadfast, no?