Thread:Adnoam/@comment-26115937-20180812141308/@comment-25219384-20180813064239

Regarding "I don't think these categories are ever manually assigned?"
 * I think there are still pages which directly include categories, instead of going by the templates. I still encounter them all the time while cleaning up other stuff. So I'm not sure if this will help more than cause inconsistencies (or whether those cases will be easy to identify).
 * If we'd been designing the wiki's category structure from scratch, then I believe we'd go with what you outline here (Category:QualityName which has as sub-categories the Uses/Gain/Sources/Loss/Challenge categories).

Regarding: "So in a way Category: QualityName Challenge is already accessible from the quality page but it's not super intuitive."
 * Note that this is true only if the Challenge category page exists (which it often does not, even if pages are categorized under it).

Regarding "is there a reason we didn't do something similar for the Gains/Losses categories (which we currently toggle manually"
 * Depending on the quality, it's not always useful to show Gains/Losses/Sources, so we can toggle it. We do always show the "Uses" category on the quality's page (and it if doesn't exist we tag it for maintenance, so that every quality will have a Category).