Talk:A memory.../@comment-134.117.27.24-20110916200417/@comment-71.178.116.51-20110919052753

I've looked at the storyline you're referring to, Jemann. I looked at it before posting my previous comment, which is why I said I believe it's only related to the first few setences. I've rechecked and I still believe that's true. The vague allusions to a story about "the Ambitious Clergyman and his Deviless" and something to do with the Repentant Forger, and that it all started with the painting is all that one can get out of this without knowing the actual fate content. The whole rest of that page is about the murder that begins with "Featuring_in_the_Tales_of_the_University" (which I've not read from beginning to end BTW) and is NOT fate locked content. So I don't think the "owners" are actually losing anything by this and it might actually intrigue ppl who've not read that fate locked story to buy it--after seeing this interesting tidbit. (They might even have been vague on purpose in consideration of a situation like this.) In any case, I believe the bottom line is still this: A clear and simple rule to not post fate locked content, but everything should be allowed, regardless. Otherwise things get messy and we unnecessarily lose a lot of additional content.