Thread:Mr teem/@comment-1264592-20140113103612/@comment-6042046-20140114141710

Thanks for your contributions. I welcome further ones. :)

"In that spirit, revealing important clues about--in this case--the royal connections of the mysterious person is something that ought to be revealed in the game, not necessarily in the a wiki. IMO, rewriting their storytelling work in a shorter form is something that they might not appreciate, either."

I want it to be clear: those are really not issues, rest assured. FBG are the ones who specifically asked (in private email) for summaries to be incorporated into the wiki. Summaries are simply someone else rewriting the original work; there's more player engagement and effort to be found there than paste-bucketing, like you said, their storytelling "wholesale". Before FBG brought it up, Jemann (the head editor) suggested summaries privately to the wikia admins. Like you, I wasn't comfortable with the notion because "Hey, maybe FBG would dislike it?" ...An unfounded worry in the end!

What FBG might dislike: a shoddy summary. :P I feel this is a concern for many would-be contributors. It's okay. Don't stress over it. You're writing an abridged version of 1-3 paragraphs of text. It need not be a lion's piece.